you're reading...
Disparagement, First Amendment Rights, Lanham Act, Redskins, The Slants, Trademarks, Uncategorized


To update my earlier blog [Blog] concerning whether Section 2 (a) of the Lanham Act, 1946, which restricts federal registration of trademarks  found to be scandalous or disparaging, will withstand challenges to its constitutionality, the Redskins football team has raised the ante by its unusual petition to the Supreme Court.

In the petition, the Redskins suggests that the Supreme Court not consider the constitutionality of Section 2 (a) until after the team’s appeal of an adverse District Court ruling is decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.  However, in light of the decision by the Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit  in In re Simon Shiao Tam-2014-1203,  (“Tam”) that Section 2 (a) did violate the First Amendment right of an Asian-American rock band seeking registration for their mark–The Slants, the Redskin’s petition also asks, if the Supreme Court decides to hear an appeal of Tam, that it should also hear its case  “as an essential and invaluable complement to Tam.”  [Petition]

Watch this spot for more updates as this drama unfolds.

About Law Office of Barbara I. Berschler

In addition to advising my clients about general business matters associated with business formation and operation, I counsel for-profit and not-for-profit organizations about the protection and use of intellectual property.


No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: